Electoral College. What am I?

Posted in: Politics Matters | 1

Electoral College

 

The American Electoral system is often confusing to its own citizens and downright mystifying to many others. For those of us, like Canadians, who actively participate in an electoral process based on a Westminster model, the American system seems decidedly complex and actually designed to blunt the full expression of the democratic will of the people.

We are used to General Elections in which all members of the House of Commons become unemployed as they seek re-election for their jobs. Since we do not have a complete separation of the Executive leadership from the Legislative branch of government like the US, our Prime Minister, who is a sitting M.P., must pay dual attention to first ensuring re-election in their own riding at the same time as being the face for the political party they lead. We have no equivalent to a long drawn-out nomination race for the highest office in the land. What we do share in common is a “winner-take-all” reward for victory. See my earlier post http://paulswhyte.com/politics-matters/pick-me-as-your-presidential-candidate.

For all the cries of ‘democratic deficit’ in our system, we do not have a structural institution embedded in the Constitution whose sole raison d’être is to isolate the selection of the Executive leader from the very populace they will lead. In the US, the Electoral College is precisely that body.

American Presidents are not directly elected via the national popular vote from the citizenry. Instead, through this legacy institution, the Founding Fathers, originally sought to ensure that the nation’s elite, and not the people, would make this selection. However, it is important to note that since 1828 the actual practice of these electors has been to defer to popular majorities as expressed in the state’s popular vote.

The Electoral College works today as follows:

  • each state has as many electoral votes as it has U.S. senators and representatives [minimum would be 3; California has 55]
  • the state parties select these slates of electors typically as a reward for service to the party
  • 48 out of 50 states employ a “winner-take-all” system whereby the electors are awarded to the presidential candidate who wins the most votes statewide
  • there are a total of 538 electoral votes [winning requires a minimum of 270]
  • in December immediately following the November election, electors meet in their states and then mail in their votes to the sitting vice president who will announce the results in the new congressional session opening in January

There are 2 important influences that the Electoral College has on the presidential election cycle. It causes a bias in both the electoral process itself and significantly affects the campaign strategy of candidates.

  1. because all states, regardless of population, have 2 senators and must have 1 representative, the less populated states are actually overrepresented [G.W. Bush won more of these states in 2000 than A. Gore who won the overall popular vote]
  2. campaign strategies now demand a disproportionate attention and effort on winning those small number of crucial ‘swing states’ often referred to as ‘battleground states’.

Not unlike the recent calls to change the electoral system in Canada, there are those voices critical of the role and significance that the Electoral College plays in presidential elections. It remains to be seen in either jurisdiction whether there is sufficient traction amongst voters, not simply their representatives, to embrace alternate models.

 

 

Photo by KAZVorpal

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this page

One Response

  1. oldgulph

    The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country.

    Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in every presidential election. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps of pre-determined outcomes. There would no longer be a handful of ‘battleground’ states (where the two major political parties happen to have similar levels of support among voters) where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in 38+ states that have just been ‘spectators’ and ignored after the conventions.

    The National Popular Vote bill would take effect when enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes—270 of 538.
    All of the presidential electors from the enacting states will be supporters of the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC)—thereby guaranteeing that candidate with an Electoral College majority.

    The bill has passed 34 state legislative chambers in 23 rural, small, medium, large, red, blue, and purple states with 261 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 11 jurisdictions with 165 electoral votes – 61% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.

    NationalPopularVote

Leave a Reply